The Institute was established following a simple observation drawn from practice rather than theory: professionals frequently make commitments they do not systematically review.
Across industries and roles, ambition is common. Structured external accountability is not.
GPEI was created as a response to that gap.
Rather than offering advice, content, or professional networking, the Institute applies a defined procedure to professional commitments. The 90-day execution cycle is structured. Commitments are formally registered. Review sessions are scheduled and conducted against documentation. A written output summary is issued at cycle close.
The structure does not rely on motivation to function. It operates as a system.
The Institute is currently in its formative phase. The framework will be evaluated and refined through observed cycle data. In time, the Institute intends to publish structured reports documenting commitment adherence patterns and output variance across cohorts.
Those publications will reflect recorded data, not commentary.
— Dino Lorman
United Kingdom, 2026
Dino's professional background spans process improvement, operational performance, and structured systems design within complex organisational environments.
His work has centred on improving execution discipline, aligning operational priorities with measurable outcomes, and introducing review mechanisms where informal accountability previously prevailed. GPEI reflects an institutional application of those principles within a cross-border professional context.
He retains oversight of admission decisions, procedural governance, and cycle consistency across cohorts.
As the Institute evolves, formal advisory relationships will be established to support governance, performance analysis, and future cohort expansion.
Advisory appointments will be announced in due course.