GPEI was established to operate structured 90-day execution cycles for professionals across jurisdictions. The Institute requires documented commitments, enforces attendance at review sessions, and produces written output assessments at cycle close.
GPEI operates a formal cycle structure. Fellows document commitments. The Institute records them. Progress is assessed against those records at defined intervals. At cycle close, the Institute issues a written output summary for each Fellow.
The cycle structure is identical for every cohort. The Institute does not calibrate it to sector, seniority, or prior participation. The framework is consistent; what varies is the content of each Fellow's documented commitments.
GPEI does not deliver content, instruction, or facilitated discussion. It provides a structured accountability procedure and enforces participation in it.
GPEI operates in defined 90-day cycles. Each cycle has a fixed opening, structured intervals, and a formal close. There is no ongoing participation outside an active cycle. Completion of one cycle does not confer automatic entry to subsequent ones.
Every applicant is assessed before admission. The Institute evaluates professional standing, the specificity of documented objectives, and the applicant's demonstrated capacity to operate within a structured review cycle. Open enrolment is not available.
The Institute maintains its own records of each review session. Fellow progress is tracked against documented commitments, not against self-assessments. The cycle output summary is produced by the Institute, not authored by the Fellow.
Cohorts are composed across sectors and jurisdictions by design. The cross-border structure subjects each Fellow's documented commitments to review from professionals operating in different institutional contexts. This is built into the review architecture.
GPEI is in its formative phase. The Institute is expanding its cycle structure conservatively, maintaining consistency of procedure ahead of scale.
Following the inaugural cohort cycle, the Institute will begin preparing structured cycle reports — documenting commitment adherence rates, output patterns, and variance data across its Fellow base. These will be published as institutional records, not promotional material.
An institutional record is built from documented cycles, not stated intentions.